Architecture isn’t just a technical concern—it directly influences testing outcomes. A testing framework’s architecture determines how reliably it interacts with browsers, how it manages asynchronous operations, how isolated your test runs are, and how well it can scale across test environments. For instance, while Selenium relies on the WebDriver protocol—a standard that has enabled wide compatibility—it’s also bound by its limitations. Cypress, on the other hand, embeds itself within the browser, bringing a high-fidelity testing experience at the cost of flexibility. Playwright introduces a new paradigm altogether with its browser automation protocol and multi-context isolation. https://testomat.io/blog/playwright-vs-selenium-vs-cypress-a-detailed-comparison/
Architecture isn’t just a technical concern—it directly influences testing outcomes. A testing framework’s architecture determines how reliably it interacts with browsers, how it manages asynchronous operations, how isolated your test runs are, and how well it can scale across test environments. For instance, while Selenium relies on the WebDriver protocol—a standard that has enabled wide compatibility—it’s also bound by its limitations. Cypress, on the other hand, embeds itself within the browser, bringing a high-fidelity testing experience at the cost of flexibility. Playwright introduces a new paradigm altogether with its browser automation protocol and multi-context isolation. https://testomat.io/blog/playwright-vs-selenium-vs-cypress-a-detailed-comparison/
0 Kommentare
0 Anteile